TOTAL VOLUME:
$154.3b
24H VOL:
$219,029,434
24H TRANSACTIONS:
2,984,028,936
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,869,293,526
411,051
Markets across
40,408
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
4,377
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
37%
VS.
Kalshi:
63%
Closed: Oct 20, 3:30 PM EST
Polymarket
This market refers to the table tennis match between Efimenko Ivan and Ishchuk Vadym in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for October 20 at 1:10PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Efimenko Ivan' if Efimenko Ivan wins against Ishchuk Vadym. This market will resolve to 'Ishchuk Vadym' if Ishchuk Vadym wins against Efimenko Ivan. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
This market refers to the table tennis match between Efimenko Ivan and Ishchuk Vadym in Setka Cup Ukraine Men, scheduled for October 20 at 1:10PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Efimenko Ivan' if Efimenko Ivan wins against Ishchuk Vadym. This market will resolve to 'Ishchuk Vadym' if Ishchuk Vadym wins against Efimenko Ivan. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.
On Polymarket, this market is priced through a continuous auction mechanism, where traders buy and sell shares representing their belief in the outcome of the Efimenko vs. Ishchuk match. The price of these shares fluctuates based on supply and demand, effectively creating a probability estimate. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. As more traders buy shares of a particular outcome, its price increases, indicating a higher perceived probability. Conversely, selling pressure lowers the price. This dynamic pricing system allows the market to quickly incorporate new information and adjust its predictions accordingly, reflecting the aggregated insight of all participants.
This market resolves around Oct 27, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the result of the Efimenko vs. Ishchuk match is verifiable from credible public reporting. The resolution will be based on the official result declared by the governing body of the sport. Traders will then be able to claim their winnings based on the final outcome. It’s important to note that the resolution process relies on publicly available information to ensure a fair and transparent outcome for all participants in this market.
Several factors could influence the price of this market before the Oct 27, 2026 resolution date. Any news regarding the players’ form, injuries, or changes in their training regimens could significantly impact trader sentiment. Unexpected announcements about the match schedule or venue could also cause price fluctuations. Furthermore, major upsets in related matches or tournaments might shift perceptions of the players’ overall capabilities, influencing trading activity. Public opinion and analysis from sports commentators could also play a role in shaping market expectations.