TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.8b

24H VOL:

$277,138,640

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,905,404,943

412,077

Markets across

39,838

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,526

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Carolina vs Green Bay: 4th Quarter Both Teams to Score
kalshi

What will be the result of Carolina vs Green Bay?

Volume:
$6,118

Both teams score

 - Kalshi

Both teams score - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 29, 2026

Closed: Oct 29, 11:38 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Both teams score

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$6,118
N/A
N/A
$4,289
Settled
No
Total markets: 1

Description

This market focuses on whether both Carolina and Green Bay manage to score points specifically in the fourth quarter of regulation time, excluding any overtime scoring. All types of scoring plays are considered for this quarter-specific condition.

Kalshi

If Carolina and Green Bay both score points in the 4th quarter (excluding overtime) of the Carolina vs Green Bay Pro Football game originally scheduled for Oct 29, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Carolina vs Green Bay game tracks the current price of the '4th Quarter Both Teams to Score' market, along with a historical price chart showing how the market has traded over time. You’ll also find the 24-hour trading volume, currently at $6,118, and the total volume traded to date, which is $6,118. This allows you to see how actively traders are participating and how the perceived probability of this outcome is changing. The dashboard provides a real-time view of market sentiment surrounding this specific event.

Generally, prediction market odds often reflect the 'wisdom of the crowd,' potentially offering a different perspective than traditional sportsbooks. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own models and aim to balance action on both sides, while this market is driven purely by traders expressing their beliefs about the likelihood of both teams scoring in the fourth quarter. Discrepancies can arise due to differing information sources, biases, or simply variations in how each assesses the game. It's common to see prediction markets move independently of sportsbook lines, especially as new information emerges closer to the game.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous double auction, meaning traders buy and sell contracts representing the probability of 'Yes' (both teams score) or 'No' (one or both teams do not score). The price of a contract ranges from 0 to 100, representing the implied probability of the event occurring. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. As more traders buy 'Yes' contracts, the price increases, indicating a higher perceived chance of both teams scoring. Conversely, increased selling of 'Yes' contracts drives the price down. This dynamic process reflects the collective forecast of all participants.

This market resolves around Oct 30, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Specifically, resolution will depend on whether both the Carolina and Green Bay teams score at least one point during the fourth quarter of the game. Official game statistics from a reputable sports data provider will be used to determine if both teams met this condition. The final score will be the definitive factor in determining the winning outcome of this market, and all trades will be settled accordingly.

Several factors could influence trading activity in this market. Late-breaking news regarding key player injuries on either the Carolina or Green Bay teams would likely have a significant impact. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if severe weather is expected, could also shift expectations. In-game performance during the first three quarters, such as dominant offensive displays or defensive struggles, might lead traders to reassess the probability of fourth-quarter scoring. Even public sentiment, reflected in social media or expert analysis, could contribute to price movements in this market.