TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.4b

24H VOL:

$230,589,906

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,885,293,300

410,482

Markets across

40,213

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,340

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Carolina vs Chicago: 1st Period Total
kalshi

Carolina vs Chicago: 1st Period Total

Volume:
$3,502

Over 0.5 goals

 - Kalshi

Over 0.5 goals - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 10, 2026

Closed: Oct 10, 7:51 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Over 0.5 goals

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$1,389
N/A
N/A
$1,194
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Over 1.5 goals

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,630
N/A
N/A
$1,496
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 2.5 goals

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$283
N/A
N/A
$282
Settled
No
kalshi

Over 3.5 goals

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$200
N/A
N/A
$200
Settled
No
Total markets: 4

Description

These markets assess how many goals will be scored in the first period of an NHL game between Carolina and Chicago. Each market sets a different threshold for the total goals, determining whether the scoring exceeds that benchmark. The outcomes depend solely on the official game result, with specific guidelines for postponements or cancellations.

Kalshi

The markets evaluate whether the combined number of goals scored by both teams in the first period of the Carolina vs Chicago NHL game scheduled for October 10, 2026, exceeds specified thresholds of 0.5, 1.5, or 2.5 goals. All markets resolve to 'Yes' if the total goals meet or surpass their respective thresholds. If the game is postponed but starts within 48 hours of the original time, the markets remain open and resolve based on the final result. If the game is cancelled or does not start within 48 hours, all markets resolve to a fair price. Overtime goals in the third period are excluded from consideration, though this note appears to be contextually misplaced for first-period markets.