TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.6b

24H VOL:

$333,432,169

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,640,614

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,971,286,090

419,492

Markets across

40,634

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,654

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Baylor vs UCF: Overtime
kalshi

What is the result of Baylor vs UCF?

Volume:
$7,931

Game goes to overtime

 - Kalshi

Game goes to overtime - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 31, 2026

Closed: Oct 30, 11:10 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Game goes to overtime

View
0%
9%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$7,931
N/A
N/A
$6,193
Settled
No
Total markets: 1

Description

An upcoming college football game features two teams competing against each other, and if the match extends beyond regulation time due to tied scores, an additional period will be played to determine a clear winner. The focus is on whether the game will require this extra time to conclude. This scenario tests the competitive balance between the participating teams and their ability to secure a decisive lead within the standard timeframe.

Kalshi

If at least 1 overtime period is played in the Baylor vs UCF college football game originally scheduled for Oct 30, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Baylor vs UCF game tracks the current odds, price history, and 24-hour trading volume. You’ll find a visual representation of how the market is pricing the likelihood of different outcomes, allowing you to see shifts in sentiment over time. Currently, the 24-hour volume is $6,846, and the total volume traded on this market is $7,931. This provides a clear picture of market activity and how traders are positioning themselves ahead of the game.

Generally, prediction market odds often reflect the wisdom of the crowd, potentially offering a different perspective than traditional sportsbook odds. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own models and risk management, while this market aggregates the beliefs of many individual traders. It's common to see discrepancies, especially before significant events or when new information emerges. Analyzing these differences can be valuable for informed decision-making, but remember that both represent probabilities as perceived by different groups.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order book where traders buy and sell contracts representing different outcomes. The price of each contract reflects the market’s collective assessment of the probability of that outcome occurring. As more traders participate, the prices adjust to reflect the latest information and sentiment. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. Price fluctuations are driven by supply and demand, with increased buying pressure raising prices and increased selling pressure lowering them. This dynamic pricing mechanism aims to provide a real-time estimate of the event's likelihood.

This market resolves around Oct 31, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. The result of the Baylor vs UCF game, specifically whether the game went to overtime, will be used to determine the winning contract. Verification will rely on official game statistics and results published by trusted sports news sources. Traders holding the winning contract will receive a payout based on the final market price at resolution.

Several factors could influence this market before resolution. Any news regarding key player injuries for either Baylor or UCF would likely cause significant movement. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if severe weather is expected during the game, could also impact trading activity. Additionally, late-breaking news about team strategies or coaching decisions might shift traders’ expectations. Public sentiment, reflected in polls or expert analyses, could also contribute to price fluctuations in this market.