TOTAL VOLUME:

$154.3b

24H VOL:

$228,458,490

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,984,028,936

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,879,276,037

410,833

Markets across

40,345

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

4,363

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

37%

VS.

Kalshi:

63%

BETA
Dashboards
Tour
All
Sports
Arkansas vs Texas A&M: 2nd Quarter Winner
kalshi

What is the result of Arkansas vs Texas A&M?

Volume:
$5,906

Texas A&M

 - Kalshi

Texas A&M - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Oct 3, 2026

Closed: Oct 3, 8:38 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Texas A&M

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
—
N/A
$3,069
N/A
N/A
$2,738
Settled
Yes
kalshi

Arkansas

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$1,862
N/A
N/A
$1,775
Settled
No
kalshi

Tie

0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$975
N/A
N/A
$788
Settled
No
Total markets: 3

Description

This market focuses on determining which team will score more points in a specific quarter of a college football game between Arkansas and Texas A&M. The outcome depends solely on the performance during the second quarter, regardless of the overall game result.

Kalshi

If Texas A&M wins the 2nd quarter of the Arkansas vs Texas A&M college football game originally scheduled for Oct 3, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. If Arkansas wins the 2nd quarter of the Arkansas vs Texas A&M college football game originally scheduled for Oct 3, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes. If neither team wins the 2nd quarter of the Arkansas vs Texas A&M college football game originally scheduled for Oct 3, 2026, then the market resolves to Yes.

Frequently asked questions

On Kalshi, the dashboard for the Arkansas vs Texas A&M 2nd quarter market displays the current price of each outcome – which team will win the 2nd quarter. It also tracks the 24-hour trading volume, currently at $5,906, and the total volume traded to date, which is $5,906. You can view a price history chart to see how the market has moved over time, providing insight into trader sentiment. This allows you to monitor the evolving probabilities as perceived by the crowd.

Typically, prediction market odds reflect the wisdom of the crowd and can differ from traditional sportsbook odds. Sportsbooks set lines based on their own models and aim to balance action on both sides, incorporating a profit margin. This market, however, is driven by individuals trading based on their own information and beliefs. If a significant number of people believe one team is more likely to win the 2nd quarter than sportsbooks suggest, the price will move accordingly, potentially offering value to informed traders. It's a different way to assess probabilities.

On Kalshi, this market is priced through a continuous order book, meaning traders are constantly buying and selling contracts representing each possible outcome. The price of a contract reflects the probability of that outcome occurring, as perceived by the market participants. On Kalshi, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. As more traders buy contracts for a particular team, the price increases, and vice versa. This dynamic pricing mechanism ensures the market reflects the collective intelligence of those trading it, creating a real-time probability assessment for the 2nd quarter winner.

This market resolves around Oct 4, 2026, with the outcome confirmed once the event is verifiable from credible public reporting. Specifically, the market will settle based on which team has the higher score at the end of the 2nd quarter of the Arkansas vs Texas A&M football game. Official game statistics will be used to determine the winner. The platform will then distribute payouts to those who correctly predicted the 2nd quarter winner based on the final score.

Several factors could influence the price of this market. Any news regarding injuries to key players on either the Arkansas or Texas A&M team would likely cause significant movement. Changes in weather forecasts, particularly if they suggest adverse conditions, could also impact trading activity. Unexpected coaching decisions or strategic adjustments announced before the game might also shift probabilities. Finally, even public sentiment and betting trends observed elsewhere could influence how traders position themselves in this market.