TOTAL VOLUME:

$97.2b

24H VOL:

$205,769,171

24H TRANSACTIONS:

950,106,883

OPEN INTEREST:

$2,078,492,000

827,238

Markets across

14,795

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

884

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

45%

VS.

Kalshi:

55%

BETA
Which countries will Trump make new trade deals with before 2027?

Which countries will Trump make new trade deals with before 2027? Odds & Prediction Markets

Total volume:
$360,810
Volume 24h:
$1,096
4%
Liquidity:
$71,142
51%
Open interest:
$2,660
0%
PredictionHero
India 23%
polymarket
India 13%
kalshi
South Korea 19%
polymarket
Feb 2026Feb 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Mar 2026Apr 2026Apr 2026Apr 2026May 2026May 2026May 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jun 2026Jul 2026101520253035
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result

Description

This event group tracks whether the United States will establish new free trade agreements with specific countries before the end of 2026. Markets span 18 countries across Polymarket and 9 entities across Kalshi, with resolution contingent on formal legal enactment—either through Senate ratification with Presidential approval or Congressional-Executive Agreement signed into law.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Unified Resolution Criteria (Consistent across platforms)

Both platforms apply identical legal enactment standards (Senate ratification + Presidential approval OR Congressional-Executive Agreement + Presidential signature) and share the same deadline (end of 2026), with resolution sourced from credible reporting consensus.Primary resolution logic: Consensus of credible reporting on U.S. trade agreement enactment; official U.S. government trade sources (USTR, Congress legislative records) serve as authoritative verification.

Core resolution logic:

  • A new free trade deal must become law before December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (or January 1, 2027 per Kalshi).
  • Legal enactment requires either: (a) Senate ratification and Presidential approval, or (b) Congressional-Executive Agreement signed into law by the President.
  • The agreement must be 'new'—not a renegotiation or amendment of an existing deal unless explicitly framed as a separate agreement.
  • Resolution is determined by consensus of credible reporting; no single source is binding.
  • Bilateral or multilateral agreements both qualify; the specified country/entity must be a party to the deal.

Edge cases & clarifications:

  • Renegotiation vs. New Deal: If an existing agreement (e.g., USMCA) is renegotiated or amended, it does NOT resolve to Yes unless explicitly marketed as a new, separate agreement with a distinct legal instrument.
  • Multilateral Agreements: If the U.S. joins a multilateral trade agreement that includes the specified country, it qualifies as long as the agreement becomes law by the deadline.
  • Signature vs. Enactment: Presidential signature of implementing legislation is the trigger, not mere negotiation or signing of the agreement text. The deal must be enacted into U.S. law.
  • Credible Reporting Consensus: If major news outlets and official sources conflict on whether a deal has become law, resolution may be delayed pending clarification; markets should not resolve on isolated or unverified claims.
  • Country Coverage Divergence: Polymarket covers 18 countries; Kalshi covers 9 entities (including Kenya and China, which Polymarket does not list). Each platform resolves only its listed markets independently.
Timing: Resolution occurs on or before December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (Polymarket) / January 1, 2027 (Kalshi). Markets resolve to No if no new trade deal becomes law by this deadline.Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.
Show more

Polymarket

This market will resolve to "Yes" if a free trade agreement with the specified country or entity becomes law in the United States by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". This includes both agreements that become law through Senate ratification and Presidential approval, or through the enactment of a Congressional-Executive Agreement signed into law by the President. The resolution source will be a consensus of credible reporting.

Kalshi

A trade deal with any specified country resolves to Yes if it becomes law through one of two mechanisms: (1) Senate ratification followed by Presidential approval, or (2) Congressional-Executive Agreement followed by Presidential signature of the implementing legislation. The deal must be newly negotiated and become legally binding after market issuance but before January 1, 2027. Both pathways require formal Presidential action to finalize the agreement into law. The resolution criteria are identical across all countries, with each country's market operating independently based on whether its respective trade agreement meets these legal requirements by the deadline.

Frequently asked questions

The Trump trade deals market aggregates trader forecasts across Polymarket and Kalshi on which countries will enter new trade agreements with the United States before 2027. This market reflects real-time consensus by pricing individual country outcomes—such as Pakistan, India, or the European Union—based on how traders weight geopolitical likelihood and negotiation momentum. Cross-platform tracking reveals whether consensus is firm or fragmented; divergence between venues often signals uncertainty about deal timing or political feasibility. The dashboard displays current odds, trading volume, and historical price movement to help you gauge market conviction on each potential trade partner.

Prediction markets and polls measure different things. Polls capture public opinion or expert sentiment at a snapshot in time, while this market prices the actual probability of a trade deal occurring based on trader capital allocation and real-money incentives. Traders incorporate news, diplomatic signals, and economic data continuously, making prediction markets more dynamic than static surveys. For trade policy, markets often diverge from polls because deal-making depends on negotiation outcomes and political will rather than public preference. If you see this market pricing a country outcome higher than expert consensus suggests, traders may be pricing in non-public signals or underestimated momentum.

Polymarket and Kalshi serve different trader bases, regulatory frameworks, and liquidity pools, which can create temporary price gaps on the same outcome. Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. One platform may attract more geopolitical specialists while the other draws retail traders, leading to different risk assessments of trade deal likelihood. Liquidity depth also varies; a smaller order on one venue can move the price more than on a deeper market. These spreads typically narrow as arbitrageurs trade across platforms, but during low-volume periods or breaking news, divergence can persist for hours. Comparing both prices helps you identify whether you're seeing genuine disagreement or just market microstructure noise.

This market resolves around Jan 1, 2027, at which point the outcome is confirmed once any new trade agreements are verifiable from credible public reporting. Each country outcome settles independently based on whether a formal trade deal was announced and signed by that date. The resolution hinges on official statements from the U.S. Trade Representative, White House announcements, or bilateral trade authority confirmations. Markets typically close a few days before the end date to allow time for final verification and settlement processing.

Major catalysts include official trade negotiations announcements, bilateral summit schedules, tariff policy shifts, and congressional trade authority votes. Positive signals—such as a U.S. delegation visit or a country removing trade barriers—typically push odds higher for that outcome. Conversely, diplomatic tensions, failed negotiation rounds, or competing trade blocs can lower prices. Economic data on bilateral trade flows and geopolitical events (elections, sanctions, supply-chain shifts) also influence trader expectations. Watch for statements from the U.S. Trade Representative and partner nations' trade ministers, as these often precede formal deal announcements and move this market sharply.

Follow the signals, not the noise

Get insights on market conviction, notable shifts, and what the data is quietly signaling.

PredictionHero © 2026 · v0.19.2PredictionHero provides aggregated market data and informational signals only. Nothing on this site constitutes financial, legal, or investment advice. Markets are volatile and speculative. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making decisions involving risk. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.