TOTAL VOLUME:

$134.2b

24H VOL:

$134,145,987

24H TRANSACTIONS:

2,388,728,490

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,441,166,947

406,422

Markets across

30,383

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

2,688

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

5

Polymarket:

39%

VS.

Kalshi:

61%

BETA
Dashboards
Insights
Indices
Tour
All
Trending
Breaking
New
Ending Soon
Politics
Sports
Crypto
Companies
Elections
Financials
Economics
Other
Entertainment
Science and Technology
ICC T20 World Cup, Women: New Zealand vs Sri Lanka
kalshi
polymarket

ICC T20 World Cup, Women: New Zealand vs Sri Lanka

Volume:
$4,557,862

Sri Lanka

 - Kalshi

Sri Lanka - Kalshi

1W

News

Positive

Negative

Neutral

Hover marker for details

Vol.

·

Resolved Jun 16, 2026

Closed: Jun 16, 12:51 PM EST

kalshi

Kalshi

View
Join Kalshi and score $25 for your first trade.
Outcome
Trade
Chance %
Price
Spread
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
kalshi

Sri Lanka

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
100¢
N/A
$2,336,179
N/A
N/A
$827,477
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ICC T20 World Cup, Women: New Zealand vs Sri Lanka - Completed match?

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
0.9¢
N/A
$444
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
polymarket

ICC T20 World Cup, Women: New Zealand vs Sri Lanka - Who wins the toss?

View
100%
Yes 100¢No 0¢
1¢
N/A
$129
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
kalshi

New Zealand

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
100¢
N/A
$1,647,464
N/A
N/A
$630,567
Settled
No
polymarket

ICC T20 World Cup, Women: New Zealand vs Sri Lanka

View
0%
Yes 0¢No 100¢
—
N/A
$573,646
N/A
N/A
N/A
Settled
Yes
Total markets: 5

Intro

This market tracks which team will win the women's T20 World Cup cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka. Across Kalshi and Polymarket, the consensus probability for New Zealand to win stands at 99.5%. Resolution will be determined by official ESPNcricinfo records and ICC competition rules following the match scheduled for June 16, 2026 at 9:30 AM EDT. Watch for the actual match outcome on that date, as it will trigger final settlement across all aggregated platforms.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue: Kalshi market contains a logical contradiction where both possible match outcomes (New Zealand win and Sri Lanka win) resolve to Yes, making the market fundamentally unresolvable and creating a guaranteed payout regardless of actual result.Hero tip: Avoid the Kalshi market entirely due to the logical flaw. Trade only on Polymarket, which has proper binary structure: official ESPNcricinfo result determines winner, Super Over resolves ties if available under playing conditions, and 50-50 applies only for abandonment or no-result scenarios.

Critical divergence points:

  • Kalshi: CRITICAL FLAW: Both conditional branches resolve to Yes. Market states 'If New Zealand wins...resolves to Yes' and 'If Sri Lanka wins...resolves to Yes', leaving no logical path to No resolution. This violates binary market structure and makes the market unresolvable.
  • Polymarket: Proper binary structure with three distinct outcomes: (1) Match winner per ESPNcricinfo official result, (2) Super Over winner if tied and tiebreak available, (3) 50-50 split only if match abandoned, no-result, or permanently canceled. Source: ESPNcricinfo with 2-hour fallback to credible consensus.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Polymarket

This market refers to the cricket match between New Zealand and Sri Lanka scheduled for June 16 2026 in ICC T20 World Cup, Women. This market resolves according to the finalized match result as published by https://www.espncricinfo.com/. DLS/DRS, over-rate penalties, forfeit/walkover, or any other on-field ruling that leads the competition to declare a winner are treated as ordinary wins. If the match ends tied and the playing conditions provide an on-field tiebreak (e.g., Super Over), the winner determined by that tiebreak will be used for resolution. If the match ends tied and no on-field tiebreak is used or available under the playing conditions (e.g., group-stage ODI with no Super Over), the market will resolve 50-50. If the match is postponed/rescheduled, the market remains open until the listed fixture is completed. If the match is permanently canceled or abandoned or otherwise is completed without a winner, the market resolves 50-50. The primary resolution source for this market is the official statistics of the event as recognized by the governing body or event organizers. However, if the governing body or event organizers have not published final match statistics within 2 hours after the event's conclusion, a consensus of credible reporting may be used instead.

Kalshi

Resolution depends on the official result declared by the governing body. If the match ends in a tie, draw, no result (NR), abandonment, or cancellation with no official winner declared, all markets resolve to $0.50. If a forfeit, disqualification, or concession occurs before the match begins, all markets resolve to $0.50. If such an event occurs after play has begun and the governing body declares an official winner, the market resolves based on that result. If play begins but insufficient play occurs to determine an official result, all markets resolve to $0.50.

Frequently asked questions

Prediction markets like these operate on crowd-sourced pricing rather than traditional sportsbook models. Instead of fixed odds set by oddsmakers, traders continuously buy and sell shares reflecting their belief in each outcome. This market-driven approach often surfaces sharper, more responsive odds because participants have real capital at stake. Comparing this market's implied probabilities to major sportsbooks can reveal value opportunities, though prediction markets typically show lower liquidity and wider spreads than established betting venues.

Polymarket and Kalshi can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. Each platform operates under distinct market rules, fee structures, and user bases, which can create temporary price gaps. Kalshi and Polymarket may attract different trader demographics with varying risk appetites and information sets. Order book depth, trading volume, and settlement mechanics also differ between venues. Arbitrage traders typically exploit these spreads, but friction costs and platform-specific constraints mean gaps can persist. Monitoring both prices helps you understand which platform's consensus is more liquid or informed at any given moment.

Key injury announcements, team roster changes, and recent form updates will likely shift odds significantly. Weather forecasts closer to match day can influence trading, especially if conditions favor one team's playing style. Head-to-head historical performance and any pre-match commentary from team management may trigger repricing. Betting syndicates and sharp money flowing into either side can accelerate momentum. Live team news, fitness updates, and toss-related factors in the final hours before play often generate the sharpest market moves.