TOTAL VOLUME:
$97.2b
24H VOL:
$177,903,386
24H TRANSACTIONS:
950,106,883
OPEN INTEREST:
$2,049,845,057
824,617
Markets across
14,701
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
899
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
45%
VS.
Kalshi:
55%
Will a new country join the Abraham Accords before 2027? Odds & Prediction Markets
27%
chance
Will a new country join the Abraham Accords before 2027?
$
$20
$50
$100
$500
Intro
This market tracks whether any country outside the current Abraham Accords signatories will formally join the framework through a normalization agreement with Israel. On Polymarket, the probability of at least one new country joining stands at 57.6%. The resolution will be determined by official government statements or credible reporting confirming a formal signing. Watch for diplomatic announcements and official agreements through December 31, 2026, the final deadline for resolution.
Polymarket
This market will resolve to "Yes" if any country not already a part of the Abraham Accords formally signs a normalization agreement with Israel under the framework of the Abraham Accords by December 31, 2026 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A formal signing refers to an official agreement between Israel and another country that is publicly acknowledged by both governments and clearly attributed to the Abraham Accords or their continuation. Countries already part of the Abraham Accords as of June 26, 2025—including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan—will not count. The resolution source will be official government statements, however a consensus for credible reporting may also be used.
Frequently asked questions
Prediction market odds represent crowdsourced probability estimates from traders with financial incentives to forecast accurately, whereas analyst forecasts typically reflect expert opinion from think tanks, diplomatic specialists, and geopolitical research firms. Market-based estimates often incorporate real-time information and react quickly to breaking news about diplomatic negotiations or regional developments. Analysts may offer deeper contextual analysis of specific countries' political positions or treaty requirements. Comparing the two approaches provides a fuller picture: markets show aggregate trader confidence, while analysts highlight the reasoning and conditions that could drive new accessions to the Abraham Accords.
On Polymarket, this market is priced at 27.4% for the affirmative outcome. On Polymarket, prices reflect that venue's order book, liquidity, and how traders price the outcome right now. The price reflects the collective assessment of traders regarding the probability that at least one additional nation will formally join the Abraham Accords framework before the end of 2026. Traders buy and sell shares corresponding to yes or no outcomes, with the market price converging toward the implied probability. Higher prices indicate stronger trader confidence in new accessions occurring within the timeframe, while lower prices suggest skepticism about near-term expansion of the accord signatories.
The market resolves on Dec 31, 2026. Resolution depends on whether at least one additional country has formally joined the Abraham Accords framework by that deadline. The determination considers official government announcements, diplomatic agreements, and recognized accessions to the accord. Traders should monitor official statements from participating nations, regional diplomatic developments, and announcements from the countries currently party to the framework. The outcome is binary: either a new country joins before the deadline, or the market resolves to no.
Key catalysts include official diplomatic announcements from Middle Eastern or North African nations signaling intent to join, high-level political visits or negotiations between potential signatories and current accord members, and regional geopolitical shifts that alter incentives for accession. Changes in U.S. diplomatic engagement or policy toward the Abraham Accords framework could influence momentum. Peace developments in regional conflicts, normalization agreements, or trade and security partnership announcements may prompt new countries to evaluate membership. Media reports of behind-the-scenes negotiations or leaked diplomatic cables could move trader expectations. Economic or security benefits offered to new signatories may accelerate decisions.
Follow the signals, not the noise
Get insights on market conviction, notable shifts, and what the data is quietly signaling.