TOTAL VOLUME:
$116.7b
24H VOL:
$107,266,600
24H TRANSACTIONS:
1,362,287,844
OPEN INTEREST:
$1,176,258,675
332,550
Markets across
33,140
events
MATCHED EVENTS:
4,150
PLATFORM COVERAGE:
5
Polymarket:
42%
VS.
Kalshi:
58%
No Bond chosen
- Polymarket
No Bond chosen - Polymarket
100%
1W
News
Positive
Negative
Neutral
Hover marker for details
No volume data
Aug 19
Aug 26
Vol.
$0.0
·
Closed: Jul 1, 3:24 AM EST
Polymarket
This market tracks whether an actor will be officially announced as the next James Bond by June 30, 2026. Across Polymarket and Opinion, the consensus probability that no announcement occurs by the deadline stands at 98.3%. Resolution is determined by official announcement from Amazon MGM Studios, with major entertainment news outlets serving as secondary confirmation. Watch for any official studio statement or credible media reports of a casting decision before the June 30, 2026 announcement window closes.
This is a market on who will be the next actor to play James Bond in the upcoming film series.
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the above actor is officially announced as the next James Bond actor by June 30, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. This market will resolve based on the first official announcement of who will be the next James Bond, regardless of any changes made thereafter. If no actor is announced as the next Bond within the timeframe, this market will resolve to "No Bond chosen". The primary resolution source for this market will be official information from Amazon MGM Studios. However, a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Polymarket and Opinion may show different odds for the same casting outcome due to variations in user base, liquidity depth, and fee structures. Polymarket and Opinion can show different implied probabilities for the same outcome because of liquidity, fee structure, participant mix, and how each venue defines the contract. One platform might attract more casual bettors while the other draws professional traders, shifting the price. Liquidity imbalances mean a large trade on one venue can move odds more sharply than on another. Settlement rules or candidate definitions could also be interpreted slightly differently across platforms. Savvy traders monitor these spreads and arbitrage gaps, gradually aligning prices—but temporary divergence is normal and creates trading opportunities.
Major catalysts include studio statements, director or producer interviews hinting at casting direction, and actor availability announcements. Franchise leadership changes or shifts in creative vision can reshape odds significantly. Social media campaigns or fan petitions occasionally influence studio decisions and trader sentiment. Industry trade reports about contract negotiations or screen tests move prices sharply. Competing casting news from rival studios may redirect attention and capital. Economic factors—box office performance of recent Bond films or actor box-office appeal—also weigh on trader conviction. Any credible reporting linking a specific actor to formal negotiations typically triggers immediate repricing across this market.