TOTAL VOLUME:

$54.4b

24H VOL:

$218,201,443

24H TRANSACTIONS:

527,797,601

OPEN INTEREST:

$1,191,873,651

500,842

Markets across

13,663

events

MATCHED EVENTS:

1,809

PLATFORM COVERAGE:

4

Polymarket:

51%

VS.

Kalshi:

49%

BETA
Dashboards
polymarket
kalshi
Trending

CA Gimnasia y Esgrima de Mendoza vs. CA Lanús - More Markets

Volume:
$191,425
Outcome
Chance %
Price
Liquidity
Volume
24h
7d
Open Interest
Ends in
Result
Trade

Description

This event group covers a Primera División Argentina match between CA Gimnasia y Esgrima de Mendoza and CA Lanús scheduled for April 20, 2026 at 8:45 PM ET. The markets span spread betting (±1.5 and ±2.5 goal margins), total goals over/under (1.5, 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5), and a both-teams-to-score proposition. All markets resolve based on the official final score after 90 minutes of regular play plus stoppage time, excluding extra time or penalties.

PredictionHero - Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA)

Divergence Detected

Issue:

Kalshi markets contain a logical contradiction that makes them fundamentally unresolvable: all three outcome markets (Lanus wins, Mendoza wins, Tie) are defined to resolve YES, which violates basic mutual exclusivity. Polymarket markets are logically coherent with clear binary or spread-based resolution criteria.

Hero Tip:

Avoid Kalshi markets in this group entirely. They cannot resolve properly because the platform has defined all three mutually exclusive outcomes to resolve YES simultaneously. Polymarket offers clear, resolvable markets with consistent binary logic across all spreads and totals.

Critical Divergence Points:

  • Polymarket: All markets use coherent binary or spread-based logic tied to official AFA final scores. Spread markets resolve YES if the named team wins by the specified margin or more; Over/Under markets resolve YES if combined goals meet or exceed the threshold; Both Teams to Score resolves YES only if both teams score at least one goal. Example: 'Spread: CA Lanús (-1.5)' resolves YES if Lanús wins by 2+ goals, otherwise NO. Resolution source is afa.com.ar with 2-hour fallback to credible reporting.
  • Kalshi: Critical logical flaw: All three mutually exclusive outcome markets are defined identically to resolve YES. Market 1 states 'If Lanus wins...then resolves to Yes.' Market 2 states 'If Mendoza wins...then resolves to Yes.' Market 3 states 'If Tie wins...then resolves to Yes.' Since exactly one of these three outcomes must occur, all three markets would resolve YES simultaneously, which is logically impossible and makes the markets unresolvable.
Our PredictionHero Resolution Divergence Alerts (RDA) are there to help users identify potential differences across platforms. They do not replace or supersede the official rules and description of any prediction market. Users are solely responsible for reviewing and understanding the applicable rules and resolution criteria before placing any trade or bet. If you notice a potential inconsistency, discrepancy, or error in an alert, please report it to our team so we can review and improve the accuracy of our data.

Follow the signals, not the noise

Get insights on market conviction, notable shifts, and what the data is quietly signaling.

Company

Brand Kit

API & Data Licensing

Methodology

Help Center

Contact

PredictionHero © 2026 · v0.13.0PredictionHero provides aggregated market data and informational signals only. Nothing on this site constitutes financial, legal, or investment advice. Markets are volatile and speculative. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Always do your own research and consult qualified professionals before making decisions involving risk.